The Memo That Could Turn the Tide Against Planned Parenthood Tax Funding 

by Martin Barillas Sunday, March 27, 2011
From: Randy Engel, Director, U.S. Coalition for Life

Subject: The Memo That Could Turn the Tide Against Planned Parenthood Tax Funding


Date: March 27, 2011

Timing is Critical - Act NOW!!!
It is urgent that this coming week you contact your U.S. Representative and two U.S. Senators
and urge them to vote to defund Planned Parenthood in any upcoming Continuing Resolution bill(s).

Planned Parenthood, which according to their own former physician Dr. George Langmyhr, was in the abortion business long before Roe v. Wade legalized baby killing, has been feeding from the public trough for far too long.

Keep your message short: No tax funds for Planned Parenthood. Provide them with this link to the Memo site:

The Jaffe/Berelson Memo

The infamous Jaffe/Berlelson Memo from Planned Parenthood Vice President Frederick S. Jaffe to Bernard Berelson, President of Rockefeller’s Population Council describes various means of population control including increasing homosexuality and compulsory abortion and sterilization. The Memo was first made public in 1970 by the U.S. Coalition for Life.

The Memo was taken from “A Family Planning Perspectives Special Supplement” published by Planned Parenthood-World Population. A copy of the Memo in its original format is available (free) from the USCL Research Library at the above link. Make sure your Representative and Senators get a copy of the Memo.

The Significance of the Jaffe/Berelson Memo

The Jaffe/Berelson Memo was drawn up by Jaffe as a companion piece to Berelson’s paper, “Beyond Family Planning,” published in the Population Council’s February 1969 issue of Studies in Family Planning .

According to Berelson, federal family planning programs are “the first step to population control.” Why? Berelson answers, “Probably because from a broad political standpoint it is the most acceptable one: since closely tied to maternal and child care it can be perceived as a health measure beyond dispute; and since voluntary it can be justified as a contribution to the effective personal freedom of individual couples.”

Is Berelson saying that Congress was duped into supporting Title X birth limitation programs in 1970 under the guise of maternal health care and volunteerism, when in fact, Congress was taking its first step toward population control, which unlike “family planning” includes a wide range of compulsory means of population reduction including compulsory abortion and sterilization and social constraints such as “encouraging increased homosexuality?”

If federal “family planning” programs are indeed stepping stones to totalitarian population control by the State, then it is time, indeed, that Uncle Sam got himself out of the birth limitation business. Cutting Planned Parenthood funding is an excellent first step toward this goal. ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­

Memorandum to Bernard Berelson (President, Population Council) found in "Activities Relevant to the Study of Population Policy for the U.S." 3/11/69 by Frederick S. Jaffe (Vice President of Planned Parenthood - World Population)

TABLE 1. Examples of Proposed Measures to Reduce U.S. Fertility, by Universality or Selectivity of Impact

Universal Impact

Social Constraints

Restructure family:

a) Postpone or avoid marriage

b) Alter image of ideal family size

Compulsory education of children

Encourage increased homosexuality

Educate for family limitation

Fertility control agents in water supply

Encourage women to work

Selective Impact Depending on Socio-Economic Status
Economic Deterrents

Modify tax policies:

a) Substantial marriage tax

b) Child Tax

c) Tax married more than single

d) Remove parents tax exemption

d) Additional taxes on parents with more than I or 2 children in school

Reduce/eliminate paid maternity leave or benefits

Reduce/eliminate children's or family allowances

Bonuses for delayed marriage and greater child-spacing

Pensions for women of 45 with less than N children

Eliminate Welfare payments after first 2 children

Chronic Depression
Require women to work and provide few child care facilities Limit/eliminate public-financed medical care, scholarships, housing, loans and subsidies to families with more than N children.

Measures Predicated on Existing Motivation to Prevent Unwanted Pregnancies

Social Controls
Compulsory abortion of out-of-wedlock pregnancies

Compulsory sterilization of all who have two children except for a few who would be allowed three

Confine childbearing to only a limited number of adults

Stock certificate type permits for children

Housing Policies:

a) Discouragement of private home ownership

b) Stop awarding public housing based on family size

Payments to encourage sterilization

Payments to encourage contraception

Payments to encourage abortion

Abortion and sterilization on demand

Allow certain contraceptives to be distributed nonmedically

Improve contraceptive technology

Make contraception truly available and accessible to all

Improve maternal health care, with family planning a core element

Source: “A Family Planning Perspectives

Special Supplement” published by

Planned Parenthood-World Population NYC, NY, 1970

0    submitted by Martin Barillas
Read More Press Releases

Thanks to robots, company registration in Singapore has become cheaper

Koincable Introduces Four Customizable HDMI Cables

SKS Ispat& Power Ltd commissions first 300-MW power unit of their 1,200-MW RaigarhPower Plant

How a Bodybuilding Diet Can Help Build Muscle Naturally

Low Carb Diet Report Casts Light On New Research Findings

Increase in the number of student visa is trending nowadays

Wiwigo Technologies: First of its kind selfie campaign takes place in moving Delhi-Chandigarh Shatabdi

An important day in real estate sector

Leonard Kim to Appear on Critical Mass Radio Show

Nishan Kohli's recent exhibition on photography

Get press releases by email